Recruiting · registry statusComparing schedules for a brain stimulation treatment
Researchers compare different gaps between stimulation sessions with standard medical treatment in people with Parkinson’s.
Testing a treatment or activity · Study reference: NCT07774312
Plain-language introduction written with AI from the registry; not independently checked by a clinician. Read the original details below ↓
Open the official registry record ↗Follow this study
Looking for volunteers
- Start (reported actual date)
- 2026-07-27
- Main measurements finished (planned)
- 2027-03-15
- Study finished (planned)
- 2027-04-15
Planned dates can move. A study finishing does not tell us when a paper will be published.
No results summary has been confirmed in the registry records we imported. See connected papers below; we keep checking after recruitment ends.
Changes we have recorded
These are dates we observed a change, not necessarily the dates it happened.
Papers connected to this study
No connected paper has been found yet. The tracker checks the growing library for study identifiers and registry-linked publications.
Who can join?
Ages 50 years to 85 years · Does not accept healthy volunteers
These are starting points, not the full rules. The research team can tell you whether the study is right for your situation.
Read all the rules for taking part
Sex eligibility reported by registry: all
Inclusion Criteria:
* 1.Aged 50-85 years, male or female.
* 2.Diagnosed with idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD) in accordance with the Chinese Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson's Disease (4th Edition), with a confirmed diagnosis for at least 6 months and a stable condition, defined as no significant deterioration or major medication adjustment within the past month.
* 3.Receiving stable doses of antiparkinsonian medication (e.g., levodopa or dopamine agonists) and willing to maintain the medication regimen during the study.
* 4.Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-3 in the medication ON state.
* 5.Baseline MDS-UPDRS Part III total score ≥20 in the medication ON state.
* 6.No history of non-invasive neuromodulation therapy, or discontinuation of such therapy for at least 3 months before enrollment if previously received.
* 7.Normal cognitive function (MoCA score ≥24) and able to cooperate with tTIS intervention, clinical scale assessments, and basic smartphone- and smartwatch-assisted home-based motor self-assessments.
* 8.Able and willing to provide written informed consent and complete all required study procedures and follow-up assessments.
Exclusion Criteria:
* 1.Other neurological disorders that may affect motor or cognitive function.
* 2.Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as claustrophobia.
* 3.History of taking antipsychotics, antidepressants, or other medications affecting dopamine levels.
* 4.Psychiatric disorders (e.g., depression or schizophrenia), substance abuse, or alcohol dependence.
* 5.Implanted medical devices (e.g., pacemaker or defibrillator), metal implants in the cranium or spine, a personal or family history of epilepsy, or severe skull defects.
* 6.Previous deep brain stimulation (DBS) or other intracranial implantation surgery, or participation in another Parkinson disease clinical trial within the past 3 months.
Full study name & original research details
Official study title
STN-targeted Temporal Interference Stimulation With Different Intervention Intervals Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Parkinson's Disease: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial
Short title used by the registry
STN-tTIS With Different Intervention Intervals Versus Standard Medical Treatment for Parkinson's Disease
Original description
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of different Intervention Intervals of subthalamic nucleus-targeted transcranial temporal interference stimulation (STN-tTIS) in patients with Parkinson disease.
Previous studies suggest that STN-tTIS may improve motor symptoms in people with Parkinson disease. However, most previous studies evaluated only one stimulation session. It remains unclear how often STN-tTIS should be administered during a repeated treatment course and whether shorter intervention intervals stimulation produces greater or longer-lasting improvement without increasing adverse events.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
1. Does STN-tTIS administered five times weekly improve motor symptoms more than standard medication treatment alone at the end of the 2-week treatment period?
2. Do once-weekly, twice-weekly, and five-times-weekly STN-tTIS produce different changes in motor symptoms?
3. Does the STN-tTIS intervention intervals influence how long its effects persist after treatment?
4. Do the different intervention intervals have different effects on non-motor symptoms, quality of life, cognitive function, and safety?
Participants will be randomly assigned to receive STN-tTIS once weekly, twice weekly, or five times weekly for 2 weeks, or to continue standard antiparkinsonian medication without additional stimulation. All participants will maintain a stable medication regimen during the study. Their motor and non-motor symptoms will be assessed during the treatment period and during a subsequent 2-week follow-up period.
Further description from the registry
Parkinson disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by both motor and non-motor symptoms that substantially impair quality of life. Although pharmacological therapy remains the standard treatment, long-term medication use is frequently associated with motor fluctuations and treatment-related complications. Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) is a novel noninvasive neuromodulation technique capable of selectively modulating deep brain structures without surgery. Previous pilot studies have demonstrated that subthalamic nucleus-targeted tTIS (STN-tTIS) may improve motor symptoms in patients with PD. However, existing studies have primarily evaluated the immediate effects of single-session stimulation, and the optimal intervention interval for repeated STN-tTIS has not yet been established.
The objective of this multicenter clinical trial is to evaluate whether different intervention intervals, defined as once-weekly, twice-weekly, and five-times-weekly STN-tTIS administration, result in different therapeutic effects in patients with PD and to compare their efficacy and safety. The study will also investigate whether the intervention interval influences the durability of clinical improvement following completion of the intervention.
Approximately 60 participants with PD will be enrolled and randomly assigned to one of three active STN-tTIS treatment groups with different intervention intervals or to a control group receiving standard medical therapy alone. All participants will continue a stable antiparkinsonian medication regimen throughout the study. The treatment period will last 2 weeks, followed by a 2-week follow-up period. Clinical efficacy will be evaluated primarily by changes in motor symptoms, while additional assessments will evaluate non-motor symptoms, sleep, quality of life, cognitive function, and safety. This study will provide information regarding the influence of intervention intervals on the efficacy and safety of repeated STN-tTIS in patients with Parkinson disease and may help inform future treatment strategies.
Conditions reported: Parkinson's Disease (PD)
Registry records for this study
Records are joined using registration identifiers. Titles alone do not establish that two studies are the same.
- Study type
- Interventional
- Interventions
- STN-tTIS Once Weekly; STN-tTIS Twice Weekly; STN-tTIS Five Times Weekly; Standard Antiparkinsonian Medication
- Phases
- NA
- Sponsor
- Ruijin Hospital
- Start date reported by registry
- 2026-07-27 (actual)
Registry updated: 2026-08-21 · Status last verified by the registry submitter: 2026-07
Registry records retrieved 2026-10-11 (UTC). Individual records may have older updates. Recruitment and eligibility must be confirmed with the study team.
Contact the research team
Public study contacts supplied to the registry. Ask whether recruitment is still open and what participation involves.
Chencheng Zhang, MD, PHD · 13381827024 · i@cchang.org
Study locations
Site status can differ from overall study status. “Status not reported” means local availability needs confirmation. Remote participation and travel arrangements must be checked with the team.
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
RecruitingChencheng Zhang, MD, PHD · 13381827024 · i@cchang.org
The original descriptions and participation rules come from the registry. Participation is voluntary and does not guarantee benefit.