RESEARCH / DISCOVERY
← Back to the library

Difficult-to-interpret dopamine transporter SPECT with [123I]ioflupane in the diagnosis of parkinsonism

Difficult-to-interpret dopamine transporter SPECT with [123I]ioflupane in the diagnosis of parkinsonism

Read the original publication

A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.

Original abstract

Abstract To estimate (i) the rate of difficult-to-interpret cases in dopamine transporter (DAT)-SPECT with [123I]ioflupane and (ii) the diagnostic accuracy of binary visual categorization in difficult-to-interpret DAT-SPECT. The study included 178 control subjects (49% females, 63.7±11.7y) and 178 sex- and age-matched patients with pre-screening clinical diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). SPECT images reconstructed by the PPMI and a local method were visually interpreted twice by 2 independent readers with respect to Parkinson-like reduction of the striatal signal using the following 6-score: –3 = clearly reduced, –2 = probably reduced, –1 = more likely reduced than normal, 1 = more likely normal than reduced, 2 = probably normal, 3 = clearly normal. Cases with 6-score of –1 or 1 were considered “difficult-to-interpret”, all other cases were considered “conclusive”. To assess diagnostic accuracy relative to the clinical group label (control, PD), the 6-score was binarized using 0 as cutoff. The proportion of difficult-to-interpret cases ranged between 3.4% (95%-CI 1.5–5.2%) and 7.6% (4.8–10.3%) across readers and reconstruction methods. The proportion of cases misclassified by the binarized score ranged between 17.4% (1.9–32.9%) and 50.0% (25.5–74.5%) among the difficult-to-interpret cases, and between 5.1% (2.7–7.4%) and 6.4% (3.8–9.0%) among the conclusive cases. (i) the proportion of difficult-to-interpret cases in DAT-SPECT for the diagnosis of parkinsonism is not larger than 10%, (ii) the diagnostic accuracy of binary decisions is severely reduced in these cases. We therefore recommend reporting difficult-to-interpret cases as “inconclusive”, unless in special situations.

Explore another example or bring your own paper

Pasted text and PDF extraction stay on this computer. The local guide explains terms and surfaces passages; rewriting requires a configured local model. Scanned PDFs need OCR first.

RECORD & PROVENANCE