Personalized versus fixed tactile cueing in Parkinson's disease: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial on gait automaticity.
Personalized versus fixed tactile cueing in Parkinson's disease: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial on gait automaticity.
Where did the research take place?
The study site has not been established. Author addresses may differ from where the research occurred.
Oregon, US · Author affiliation
Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.Location evidence
Newberg, US · Author affiliation
Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, George Fox University, Newberg, Oregon, United States of America.Location evidence
Follow the study behind this paper
Using touch cues to make walking more automatic
The registry links this paper to the study.
A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.
Original abstract
BACKGROUND: Gait automaticity, the ability of the brain to control locomotion with minimal use of executive-attentional resources, is altered in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Recently, we showed that step-synchronized tactile cueing improved gait regularity and freezing of gait in PD; however, it is not known if this cueing mode also improves gait automaticity. Thus, this study investigates the effects of step-synchronized tactile cueing (versus fixed cueing) on gait automaticity in the laboratory and during daily life. METHODS: This is a pilot, randomized, double-blinded study where sixty participants with PD will be randomized into one of two, cueing interventions: 1) personalized, step-synchronized tactile cueing and 2) tactile cueing at fixed intervals. Both cueing interventions use vibrotactile stimulation of wrist bands. During a laboratory study visit, we will measure cortical activity with a wireless, portable functional near-infrared spectroscopy system (fNIRS) during walking tasks. Gait will be assessed using inertial sensors placed on the limbs and trunk. In addition, in daily life, participants will use the same cueing mode at home. The primary outcomes include prefrontal & primary sensory cortex activity. Secondary outcomes are gait stride time, gait local dynamic stability, turn duration and trunk jerk during turning as metrics of gait automaticity in the laboratory. Daily life gait and turning are exploratory measures. DISCUSSION: This project will advance the understanding of brain mechanisms associated with walking automaticity during tactile cueing and provide the basis for innovative, personalized cueing to rehabilitate gait automaticity in people with PD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05818189.