Immediate effects and perceptions of cane use on mobility in individuals with Parkinson's disease.
Immediate effects and perceptions of cane use on mobility in individuals with Parkinson's disease.
Where did the research take place?
The study site has not been established. Author addresses may differ from where the research occurred.
Belo Horizonte, BR · Author affiliation
Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.Location evidence
Las Vegas, US · Author affiliation
Department of Physical Therapy, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, USA.Location evidence
Follow the study behind this paper
Learning to use a walking stick
The registry links this paper to the study.
A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.
Original abstract
PURPOSE: Assistive devices are prescribed to support mobility in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD); however, their effects and users' perceptions remain poorly understood. This study investigated the immediate effects and perceptions of cane use in individuals with PD as a secondary analysis of the baseline cohort of an ongoing randomized clinical trial (NCT06950255). MATERIALS AND METHODS: After receiving a single-point cane and standardized instructions, participants' mobility was assessed under randomized conditions (with/without the cane) using the 10-Meter Walk Test and the Timed "Up and Go" test and then answered questions about their perceptions of cane use. RESULTS: Fifty individuals were included (68% male; age 64 ± 9 years; disease duration 72 ± 60 months; 90% HY stage 2, 2.5, or 3). Cane use resulted in a clinically important reduction in gait speed (MD:-0.25 m/s; 95%CI -0.36 to - 0.14), and smaller decreases in cadence, step length, and sequential mobility. Participants most frequently reported no change in fear of falling and performance. Perceived need for a cane increased, and satisfaction was high. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate cane use may negatively affect mobility, however perceived benefits and acceptance of the device are not directly aligned with these changes. Cane prescription should consider both user perceptions and objective mobility changes.