RESEARCH / DISCOVERY
← Back to the library

Disentangling amantadine response variability in levodopa related dyskinesias: Role of clinical and genetic factors.

Disentangling amantadine response variability in levodopa related dyskinesias: Role of clinical and genetic factors.

Read the original publication

Where did the research take place?

The study site has not been established. Author addresses may differ from where the research occurred.

Euclid, US · Author affiliation

Genomic Sciences and Systems Biology, Cleveland Clinic Research, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA; Department of Molecular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Location evidence

San Antonio, US · Author affiliation

Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA; Movement Disorders Division, Department of Neurology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyrd Curl Dr, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Location evidence

PH · Author affiliation · country only

Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA; Institute for Neurosciences, St. Lukes Medical Center, 5th Ave, Metro Manila, Global City, Taguig, 1634, Philippines; Cardinal Santos Medical Center, 10 Wilson, Greenhills West, Metro Manila, San Juan City, 1502, Philippines; Department of Neurosciences, University of the East, Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Medical Center, 64 Aurora Boulevard, Barangay Doña Imelda, Quezon City, 1113, Philippines.
Location evidence

US · Author affiliation · country only

Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA; Institute for Neurosciences, St. Lukes Medical Center, 5th Ave, Metro Manila, Global City, Taguig, 1634, Philippines; Cardinal Santos Medical Center, 10 Wilson, Greenhills West, Metro Manila, San Juan City, 1502, Philippines; Department of Neurosciences, University of the East, Ramon Magsaysay Memorial Medical Center, 64 Aurora Boulevard, Barangay Doña Imelda, Quezon City, 1113, Philippines.
Location evidence

SA · Author affiliation · country only

Center for Neurological Restoration, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA; College of Medicine, Taibah University, Medinah, Saudi Arabia.
Location evidence

Explore research worldwide

A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.

Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Amantadine is the most commonly used pharmacologic treatment for levodopa-related dyskinesias (LRD), yet its efficacy and tolerability vary substantially, challenging clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical, demographic, and genetic factors associated with variability in amantadine treatment outcomes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients treated with amantadine for LRD. Participants were classified as responders or non-responders; with non-responders further subdivided according to the presence of intolerable side effects. Clinical and demographic data were collected and participants underwent genotyping. Polygenic risk scores for PD risk (PD-PRS) and genetic variants associated with levodopa or amantadine metabolism and LRD susceptibility were assessed. RESULTS: A total of 146 participants were included (male 57%, mean age 66.9 years); 94 provided biological samples and 86 passed quality control. Responders had a longer interval from PD diagnosis to amantadine initiation (median 5.5 vs. 3 years, p = 0.005) and higher levodopa equivalent daily dose (LEDD) (1057.6 mg ± 431.5 vs. 831.1 mg ± 504.7, p = 0.006). Among non-responders, LEDD was lower in those experiencing side effects (725.2 mg ± 397.5 vs. 1013.5 mg ± 613.6, p = 0.015). The DRD1 rs4532-C allele was nominally associated with favorable response, whereas ANKK1, DRD2, and COMT variants were nominally associated with side effects. PD-PRS showed no association with response. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and genetic factors may influence amantadine response. Earlier amantadine initiation and lower LEDD were associated with a poorer response to amantadine. Genetic markers in the dopaminergic pathways may facilitate a personalized treatment approach in PD.

Explore another example or bring your own paper

Pasted text and PDF extraction stay on this computer. The local guide explains terms and surfaces passages; rewriting requires a configured local model. Scanned PDFs need OCR first.

RECORD & PROVENANCE