Japanese translation of lindop parkinson's disease mobility assessment (LPA): validity and reliability study.
Japanese translation of lindop parkinson's disease mobility assessment (LPA): validity and reliability study.
Where did the research take place?
The study site has not been established. Author addresses may differ from where the research occurred.
Osaka, JP · Author affiliation
Department of Neurology, The University of Osaka Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. seira.taniguchi.pt@gmail.com.Location evidence
Waterloo, CA · Author affiliation
Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. seira.taniguchi.pt@gmail.com.Location evidence
Tokyo, JP · Author affiliation
Task Force on Parkinson's Disease, Japanese Society of Neurological Physical Therapy, Tokyo, Japan. seira.taniguchi.pt@gmail.com.Location evidence
JP · Author affiliation · country only
Hyogo Prefectural Rehabilitation Hospital at Nishi-Harima, Hyogo, Japan.Location evidence
Sapporo, JP · Author affiliation
Neurological Rehabilitation Center, Hokkaido Neurological Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.Location evidence
A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.
Original abstract
INTRODUCTION: The Lindop Parkinson's Disease Mobility Assessment (LPA) is a Parkinson's disease (PD)-specific clinical scale. The LPA was designed to assess core functional mobility in rehabilitation, including gait and bed mobility. This study aimed to develop a Japanese version of the LPA and evaluate its validity and reliability in PD. METHODS: Sixty-two people with PD participated in the validation analyses. The Japanese version of the LPA was developed through a standardized translation and cross-cultural adaptation process. Construct validity was examined using Spearman's rank correlations between LPA scores and relevant clinical measures. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Inter-rater reliability for video-based assessments was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and quadratic weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: The total LPA score showed very strong correlations with the axial subscore, MDS-UPDRS Part 3, bradykinesia subscore, and Berg Balance Scale (Spearman's rho = - 0.83, - 0.74, - 0.70, and 0.75, respectively; all FDR-adjusted p < 0.0001). Internal consistency was excellent for the total score, gait mobility section, and bed mobility section (Cronbach's α = 0.95, 0.94, and 0.94, respectively). Inter-rater reliability was excellent for the total score (ICC [2, 1] = 0.97). Item-level agreement assessed using quadratic weighted kappa coefficients ranged from 0.46 to 1.00 (all p ≤ 0.009). CONCLUSION: The Japanese version of the LPA demonstrated good construct validity and excellent internal consistency and inter-rater reliability for the total score in assessing gait and bed mobility in PD. Further studies are needed to examine its responsiveness and applicability among individuals with more advanced functional impairment.