RESEARCH / DISCOVERY
← Back to the library

The Development of the Digital Cognitive Screen, Parkinson's Cognition (Par-Cog).

The Development of the Digital Cognitive Screen, Parkinson's Cognition (Par-Cog).

Read the original publication

Where did the research take place?

The study site has not been established. Author addresses may differ from where the research occurred.

Belfast, GB · Author affiliation

Department of Clinical Psychology, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Location evidence

IE · Author affiliation · country only

Department of Clinical Psychology, Queen's University, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Location evidence

Explore research worldwide

A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.

Original abstract

INTRODUCTION: Recently, research has focused on understanding the assessment and management of Parkinson's Disease Mild Cognitive Impairment (PD-MCI) (Svenningsson et al., 2012). The primary aim of this two-phase study was to develop a novel cognitive assessment tool, Par-Cog (Parkinson's Cognition) designed to evaluate PD-MCI. METHODS: In Phase 1, 20 experts(including Neurologists, Geriatricians, Neuropsychologists, and PD Nurses) were recruited via social media and anonymously completed a survey on Qualtrics, providing feedback on the acceptability and validity of the Par-Cog. The qualitative data were analyzed using the content analysis method proposed by Elo & Kyngäs, 2008, while descriptive statistics analyzed the quantitative data. Phase 2 included 100 cognitively healthy participants from the British Isles, aged between 50 and 79 years, who were randomly assigned to either Group A or Group B (alternating, consecutive order for completing the Par-Cog and Addenbrookes, ACE-III) using Zoom. RESULTS: In Phase 1, the Par-Cog demonstrated strong face and content validity, with high acceptability reported by experts, particularly Neuropsychologists. In Phase 2, the total and 5 domain Par-Cog scores were normally distributed, showing no floor effects. Significant ceiling effects were found for language and visuospatial scores. Mean-based percentiles were calculated, with Pearson's correlation and regression analyses revealing significant relationships between age and education with Par-Cog scores (p <.05) except for visuospatial scores. Significant correlations were found between ACE-III and Par-Cog attention, memory, and executive functioning scores (convergent validity, p < .05). Bland Altman plots indicated good agreement between Par-Cog and ACE-III scores, and the internal consistency for Par-Cog total (α = 0.70), memory (α = .60) and executive functioning (α = 0.82) scores were deemed acceptable. The administration of the test did not statistically influence Par-Cog scores (M =.51, 95% CI [-5.78, 4.74], t(98)= -1.95, p= .835). CONCLUSION: Although the Par-Cog is still in the early stages of development, this study indicates that it serves as an effective remote assessment tool for evaluating PD-MCI, with constructs of acceptability, validity and reliability examined.

Explore another example or bring your own paper

Pasted text and PDF extraction stay on this computer. The local guide explains terms and surfaces passages; rewriting requires a configured local model. Scanned PDFs need OCR first.

RECORD & PROVENANCE