RESEARCH / DISCOVERY
← Back to the library

Can table tennis protect the aging brain? A systematic review and meta-analysis in neurodegenerative diseases.

Can table tennis protect the aging brain? A systematic review and meta-analysis in neurodegenerative diseases.

Read the original publication

Where did the research take place?

The study site has not been established. Author addresses may differ from where the research occurred.

Gdańsk, PL · Author affiliation

Gdańsk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdańsk, Poland. Electronic address: kinga.losinska@awf.gda.pl.
Location evidence

Katowice, PL · Author affiliation

The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Katowice, Poland.
Location evidence

Explore research worldwide

Publication status: retracted

A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.

Original abstract

BACKGROUND: Table tennis (TT) is an increasingly investigated intervention for supporting cognitive, motor, and psychosocial functions in older adults with neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and dementia. However, evidence remains fragmented, and the effect sizes and reliability of TT-based programs remain unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a systematic search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus) was conducted through June 30, 2025. Ten studies met inclusion criteria, with five eligible for quantitative synthesis. Random-effects meta-analyses (DerSimonian-Laird) were performed on cognitive and motor outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the JBI checklist, and certainty of evidence was graded using the GRADE framework. Out of 499 screened records, ten studies met the predefined eligibility criteria and were included in the systematic review. Of these, five studies provided sufficient statistical data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: Meta-analysis revealed large effects for cognitive outcomes (MMSE: d = 1.44; MoCA: d = 1.31), motor function (UPDRS-III: d = 1.27), and dual-task gait (TUG: d = 0.93), with low-to-moderate heterogeneity estimated (I2 = 18-42 %), though given the small number of studies, these estimates warrant cautious interpretation. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of pooled effects. GRADE evaluations indicated moderate certainty. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Table tennis appears to be a safe, feasible, and effective non-pharmacological intervention for enhancing cognitive and motor outcomes in individuals with AD, PD, and dementia. Further high-quality trials with standardized protocols and mechanistic endpoints are needed to confirm these findings and expand clinical applicability. While preliminary findings suggest beneficial effects, the limited number of small trials, geographic concentration, and methodological limitations temper definitive conclusions.

Explore another example or bring your own paper

Pasted text and PDF extraction stay on this computer. The local guide explains terms and surfaces passages; rewriting requires a configured local model. Scanned PDFs need OCR first.

RECORD & PROVENANCE