[An electrophysiologic and electropharmacological study of functional properties of the bundle of Kent in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome].
[An electrophysiologic and electropharmacological study of functional properties of the bundle of Kent in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome].
Where did the research take place?
The study site has not been established. Author addresses may differ from where the research occurred.
A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.
Original abstract
The aim of this report is to attempt a definition of functional properties of Kent bundle on the basis of electrophysiologic and electropharmacologic data obtained from 89 cases of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome selected among a total number of 114 consecutive cases of WPW syndrome that underwent electrophysiologic intracavitary study. In 36 cases anterograde (ant) and retrograde (retr) effective refractory period (ERP) of accessory pathway were evaluated with premature (atrial and ventricular) stimulation at the same driven cycle length. The ant-ERP was longer than retr-ERP in 28/36 patients, shorter in 5 and equal in 2. This strong discrepancy between ant- and retr- ERP suggests an important role of "impedance mismatch" in the activation of ventricular (or atrial) muscle through an anomalous muscular bundle. In 11 cases an intermittent pattern of ventricular preexcitation was observed; in all these patients an anterograde supernormal conduction through the accessory pathway was observed. This aspect could be related to the activation of ventricular muscle, beyond Kent bundle, in its supernormal phase of excitability, suggesting the critical role played by ventricular activation for the appearance of preexcitation. Isoproterenol, injected in 11 cases (1 among them with intermittent ventricular preexcitation in basal conditions), produced a reduction of ant-ERP in all these cases, in spite of its well known poor effect on refractoriness of myocardial fibers. Ajmaline, injected in 32 patients, was able to block ventricular preexcitation in 81% of the cases, in spite of its poor effect on refractoriness of normal tissues. It is very likely that the disappearance of ventricular preexcitation is in this instance expression of lack of ventricular excitation (distal to Kent bundle) consequent to a drug-induced reduction of membrane responsiveness of ventricular cells. In conclusion, all these aspects strongly suggest that the appearance of ventricular (or atrial) preexcitation could be related to the activation of ventricular (or atrial) muscle distal to Kent bundle, rather than to conduction through the Kent bundle itself.