RESEARCH / DISCOVERY
← Back to the library

[Is prophyilaxis necessary after urodynamic tests? Our experience].

[Is prophyilaxis necessary after urodynamic tests? Our experience].

Read the original publication

A plain-language reading has not been prepared for this paper yet.

Original abstract

Urodynamic studies should be performed only on patients with sterile urine. The use of prophylaxis after urodynamic investigation is debated (positive urinoculture in 9 to 15% of cases). The Units of Urodynamics at the Urological Clinic of the University of Genoa and of the Galliera Hospital of Genoa assessed the prevalence of bacteriuria on a sample of 336 patients (314 females and 22 males), average age 62.3, between January and December 2006. All patients with sterile urine before examination underwent a complete urodynamic test. Concomitant diseases were: diabetes (7.7%), multiple sclerosis (3.5%), Parkinson's disease (1.2%), urinary retention treated by autocatheterism (1.2 %). Urinoculture was performed seven days after the urodynamic study. All patients were asymptomatic; 40/336 urinocultures were positive (E. coli 80%, Proteus M. 10%, other 10%). The prophylaxis does not eliminate but only reduces post-urodynamic infections; we believe that the cost-benefit ratio is unfavorable.

Explore another example or bring your own paper

Pasted text and PDF extraction stay on this computer. The local guide explains terms and surfaces passages; rewriting requires a configured local model. Scanned PDFs need OCR first.

RECORD & PROVENANCE